|
Due to
the size of this article, it has been split into four pages. At the bottom
of each page will be a text link that says the next page's number (Page
Two, or Page Three etc.)
Expert-itus
The state of confusing one's own expertise with the ability to pick nits
and find faults in other people's play, demeanor, protocol and motives.
While sharing scene knowledge is generally a good thing, it can be, and
often is, overdone. Go easy on the free advice.
The
Imperial-Imperious confusion
Some scenefolk, in an effort to appear imperial (kingly, of high standard,
worthy of respect) conduct themselves in a manner that is imperious (overbearing,
bossy, judgmental). A surprising number of scene-folk are born to this
confusion. Some attain it after a few years in the community, as they
assume community leadership positions, or when they decide they should
be recognized as authorities, if not superiors. While some clearly feel
that imperious behavior demonstrates expertise, importance, and intelligence,
in truth it almost never fails to alienate potential friends and play
partners, making the offender look bad. Below is a table highlighting
the differences between desirable imperial behavior and the often time
reality:
Imperial
|
Imperious
|
Wise,
experienced |
Judgmental,
dogmatic, scornful of other points of view |
Kingly
(or Queenly), regal, carries self well |
Bossy,
arrogant, dictatorial, domineering |
Community-minded,
cooperative with others |
Clique-minded,
eager to rally others into personal feuds and vendettas |
Just,
impartial, fair-minded |
Unjust,
biased, greedy-minded |
Brave,
committed to principals |
Cowardly,
sees threats and conspiracies everywhere |
Independent
in thought |
Over-reliant
on politics, platitudes and maxims "All doms do this
A sub
that doesn't cannot be a true sub" |
Modest,
friendly to all |
Haughty,
self-important, hierarchy-obsessed, belittling towards perceived "inferiors"
|
Respectful
of the privacy of others |
Nosy,
spends time rooting into other people's business |
Large-hearted,
generous to others |
Holds
others in suspicion or contempt |
Open-minded,
appreciative of other points of view |
Stubborn,
inflexible, threatened by or hostile to change or others' points of
view, has difficulty sharing the spotlight |
Patient
with others' shortcomings |
Bitchy,
unforgiving, grudge-loving |
Self-aware,
mature |
Self-infatuated,
childish |
Social,
respectful of peers |
Asocial,
has difficulty getting along with others |
Careful
with words and speech |
Gossipy,
indiscrete, prone to bad-mouthing others |
Holds
self to high standards |
Holds
others than higher standards than self |
While pecking
order tactics like those on the right are fine for beings with the spiritual
depth of sparrows and chickens, in humans they are shallow, unkind and
run counter to the spirit of "safe, sane, and consensual". Who
can argue that the properties on the right are more admirable and effective
than those on the left? Even so, unwise bystanders occasionally reward
boorish behavior with attention and respect, reinforcing it and making
our collective problem worse. When new people see community leaders and
players of high prominence acting this way, some will try to emulate it,
believing it to be proper, accepted or connoting high status.
Scaring
the horses
This is one that deals with conduct between members of the community and
the culture outside. Some people enjoy the nonconsensual involvement of
strangers, in exhibitionism scenes in restaurants, public parks, etc.
This kind of play can be hot as blazes, but can be ethically questionable,
and in some cases illegal. While I have enjoyed the transgressive rush
of public play myself, I have come to question whether it's right to force
others to see what we do. On the other hand, there are forces in our society
that would gladly forbid grown men holding hands in public. I have no
fixed advice to offer here. This is a charged issue and one you must grapple
with on your own.
WHY
WE DO IT AND WHY WE TOLERATE IT
So what makes people act this way? There are in fact many factors that
contribute to the behavior described above. As wonderful as the kink community
can be, we are all exposed to subtle and seldom discussed irritants that
contribute to stress, uncertainty, and the sheer cussedness I have described
above. Life as a taxpaying worker, parent or citizen can be difficult
enough. Compound it with the responsibility of maintaining a top secret
personal life, and the job of developing and maintaining a whole new set
of sexual and social ethics that neither mom, dad, or any of your vanilla
friends have ever dealt with. And like water over stone, it can wear on
you as the years tick by. These "stress factors" set the stage
for the anxiety, impatience, loneliness, meanness, depression, and the
empathy deficit mentioned earlier. I have compiled a list of these factors
which surely contribute to the bad behavior we occasionally see:
- The
scene is a small world, and quarters are close, closer than we might
like at times. Because BDSM is an interest that selects at random, we
often find ourselves spending a lot of time with people we might not
otherwise choose as friends.
- ·
The scene is intensely intimate. We express our inner fantasies and
fears, sometimes share partners, see each other nude, watch each other
come... Is it any wonder people are sensitive about how we are treated
by others?
- Because
our practices are scandalously diverse, we often find ourselves in the
presence of activities that make us uncomfortable. The scene is a strange
place and it takes a while to adjust. And some things you may never
get used to.
- The
pressures of closeting: The pressure of maintaining a secret life, of
hiding your leather life from friends, colleagues and family adds a
constant overlay of tension to daily life. Scene folk have to manage
the presence of fetish contraband (toys, play equipment, clothes, literature
and erotica) whose discovery might be catastrophic. The risk, real or
perceived, can encompass loss of employment, friends, family, even custody
of one's kids.
- ·
Jealousy, loneliness, and competition for partners are facts of life,
in the scene. People without play partners may become unhappy or angry.
People seen as getting more than their share can trigger insecurity
and resentment. Even people with partners may see threats around every
corner.
- ·
The scene, like any fringe group, attracts its share of eccentrics and
outcasts, some fascinating and agreeable, others less so.
- Newcomer
naïveté: New people unacquainted to the scene's protocols
occasionally touch, grab or conduct themselves inappropriately out of
pure innocence. Although individuals typically learn to deport themselves
over time, the constant influx of newcomers means newcomer naiveté
is a constant, grating issue.
- ·
The realities of the party circuit: It is a hard fact of scene life
that most parties are private and their invite lists finite. For every
guest invited there are 20 left outside. The guest list is dictated
by what the hosts can afford, their circle of friendships, the size
of their home and many other factors. But it still stings to hear about
a party without getting an invite. And it happens all the time.
- Email
(the medium of choice for many SM participants): Without a friendly
face or modulations of human speech, text encounters can be easily misstated/misunderstood.
Couple that with the sometimes blunt writing style of email users everywhere,
the added gravity of the written word, and the ease of escalating a
private remark into public rebuke with a misplaced keystroke, and you've
got the makings of an online food fight.
- Guy
Baldwin, keynote speaker at Leather Leadership III, and a prominent
leatherman psychiatrist, found that an unusually high percentage of
his SM-practicing patients had suffered abuse as children. Others -
because of their SM interests - have grown up feeling alienated, alone
and have led difficult lives. The upshot is that there is a lot of anger
and insecurity out there that can manifest as uncivil behavior.
- ·
Some of the erotic roles we regularly encounter in the scene (the pitiless
slavemaster, the haughty dominatrix, the abjectly helpless slave, the
unhousebroken adult-baby) are not necessarily archetypes of reason,
tolerance, and maturity. Within the magic circle of a scene this is
fine. Bravo for you, if you can find partners to share your predilections
with and send them away happy. But these roles are less appropriate
in pre-scene negotiation, netwoking, and working with volunteers in
SM social and support groups. It is a crucial necessity for the mature
scene person to be able to switch off the attitude (yes 24/7 types,
this goes for you too) and adhere to acceptable adult behavior in dealing
with others in the SM community.
One of
the more sobering aspects of this list is that there really are no easy
solutions to any of these problems. The scene is small, people are sensitive,
invite lists are short, and we really do have some truly eccentric people
who will continue to behave eccentrically.
But, there
is room for hope. We do a good job of establishing and enforcing play
standards to make SM safe and hot. We are improving all the time as educators
of play practices. But, interpersonal conduct, outside of the SM encounter
itself, has not yet been made a priority, and it's probably time it should
be. We must recognize incivility (defined in part by the examples in this
report) as a threat to the health of our community, and commit ourselves
as individuals, to improving our behavior.
THOUGHTS
ON FIXING IT: A PROPOSED APPROACH
The first thing we need to do is agree that improving our interpersonal
behavior is worth doing. Once we've made that decision, we need to start
elevating the importance of interpersonal conduct as an attribute of mature
and responsible members of our community. Through mentoring and our education
programs we need to send the message that incivility defined by the examples
in this article is inappropriate behavior for citizens of our kink community.
While "scene etiquette" (a narrow subset of civility), is a
staple in the SM educational cannon, it deals mainly with protocols of
deportment and standards of interaction, and doesn't address the deeper
issues of cultivating compassion, tolerance and a more attuned awareness
of our SM brethren. Those are tougher ethics-driven issues, often without
simple answers.
Nonetheless,
improved civility should be presented as causal to the following desirable
conditions:
- Making
the scene a welcoming place for newcomers
- Stability
of friendships
- Respect
of peers
- Trust
of potential play partners (civility generally means stability)
- Strengthening
ones personal network of contacts
- Supporting
the position that sane, responsible, well-adjusted people practice SM.
- Establishing
fairness and justice (which are eternal) as having greater importance
than popularity, and bureaucratic clout (which are fleeting and can
vanish at any moment)
- Reducing
the wasteful and exhausting melodrama that Strengthens the community
and makes it healthier
Secondly
(to avoid reinventing the wheel) we need only look to our most famous
safety maxim. I propose that we all, as scenefolk and organizations extend
"safe, sane, and consensual" into the arena of interpersonal
conduct. If we turn the laser beam of SSC onto our social interaction
we would surely notice the following:
Page
Four
Back
To Page One
Back
To Page Two
Back
To General BDSM
|