Often, the topic of experience
comes up when discussing BDSM. Experience, to me, includes what I have
learned as time has gone on. I was born dominant and actively entered
this lifestyle when I was seventeen, 22 years ago. I find myself today
at the extreme "hard-line" end of the BDSM spectrum, a minority within
a minority. Do I have experience? Yes. Do I hold strong views? Certainly
- even
controversial ones. Do I have much still to learn? Of course.
Everyone does.
What I have learned thus far can be summed up as follows:
A dominant is a ruler, never a tyrant.
- But to rule requires understanding, and understanding
requires humility.
A dominant has pride, but never arrogance.
- But pride requires dignity, and dignity requires humility.
A dominant commands respect, never fear.
- But respect requires serenity, and serenity requires
humility.
A dominant employs strength, but never force.
- But strength requires knowledge, and knowledge requires
humility.
A dominant criticises, but is never offended.
- But criticism requires insight, and insight requires
humility.
A dominant receives, but never takes.
- But receiving requires giving, and giving requires
humility.
A dominant completes, but never tries to alter.
- But to complete one must be able to see what is there,
not what is missing, and this most of all requires
humility.
In short, to use an archaic phrase, "noblesse oblige."
If a dominant is the
centre of a submissive's universe, it is because *she*
thinks so, not
because he does. If you are as serious about this lifestyle
as you state,
then you already know that the kind of submissive who
will swoon just
because you enter a room is not the genuine article. No
one is obeyed, let
alone respected, just coz. The truth of the matter is
that owning is at
least as much work as being owned.
================
The above was removed from a larger context and is being
used with the author's permission. Comments are welcome.
Raven
|