First, I wish
to thank Soulhuntr, Kimiko, Tatsumi and Flagg for all their help with
this discussion, it is appreciated :)
The log:
[21:06] * ravn^Ron says Hello and welcome to #Leather_and_Roses'
weekly discussions on BDSM topics. I hope you enjoy it. The following
rules apply for all present.
[21:06] <ravn^Ron> You must be of legal age to participate,
if you are not, please leave. Legal age being 18 or 21 depending on
your location, if you are thought to be younger, you will be asked your
age. If you are found to be younger, you will be kick/banned.
[21:07] <ravn^Ron> No trolling will be tolerated, this
is not a singles night, it is a discussion night Trolling is the advertising
of yourself, wants/needs/desires, and/or personal ads. If you troll,
you will be kick/banned.
[21:07] <ravn^Ron> Harassment will not be tolerated
either. If you harass another person, and an op is made aware of it,
you will be asked to stop. If you continue, you will be kick/banned.
This discussion is for enjoyment and information, not harassment.
[21:07] <ravn^Ron> Please try to stay on topic and
discuss one thread at a time. If the discussion gets overly fast (or
overly emotional, or someone requests a break), I will call a break.
This is so everyone can take a few moments to relax, and get their thoughts
in order before continuing.
[21:07] <ravn^Ron> If it erodes into a semantics argument,
and those who are disagreeing can not agree to disagree, I will close
the discussion for the night. We are here to discuss and learn from
one anther, not fight with one another.
[21:07] <ravn^Ron> Please be polite when speaking and
do not flame anyone. Flaming is insulting the person who states an idea.
You can disagree with an idea, but do not attack the person making the
idea. Flamers, will be kicked
[21:08] <ravn^Ron> All statements are publishable on
the web site,. I will change nicks if it is requested via email to webmaster@leathernroses.com.
If I receive no requests, logs will be published in full on the web
site and the lack of a request will be taken as consent to publish your
statements.
[21:09] <ravn^Ron> I hope you enjoy tonight's discussion.
The topic is "Formal Training in BDSM" with a guest speaker, Soulhuntr,
of The Estate, a formal training school/facility in NY/NJ. It will be
run as a question/answer discussion as usual. to start, what is formal
training?
[21:09] <Soulhuntr> ::chuckles:: Ok.... so your gonna
start with an easy one :)
[21:09] <ravn^Ron> yup..an easy one to get the ball
rolling Soul :)
[21:10] <Soulhuntr> For our purposes, formal training
means that there is a fairly clear set of expectations and rules that
everyone involved understands - also, that that trainign is made with
an eye for its usefulness and appreciation by those who might not know
the rules.
[21:10] <Soulhuntr> So...
[21:10] <Soulhuntr> while someone may have lots of
rule sint heir relationship...
[21:11] <Soulhuntr> it woudl not really be "formal"
if it didn't have that element of display about it. Like "formal" dress
as opposed to casual.
[21:11] * Soulhuntr "over"
[21:11] <ravn^Ron> Could another way of defining formal
training be that the sub is trained by someone other than thier personal
dominant, in a school type setting such as the estate?
[21:12] <Soulhuntr> Actually, not really. While that
would almost always indicate that the training was formal, it is extremely
rare - and many are trained formally by their own owner.
[21:12] * Soulhuntr "over" :)
[21:13] <ravn^Ron> Ron: Is there a set time frame for
training..like oh 6 weeks or 2 years (looking at raven)?
[21:13] <ravn^Ron> raven blushes..gee thanks..
[21:13] * mizu giggles
[21:14] <min`> what are the advantages of "formal"
training?
[21:14] <arella{C}> What are the qualifications for
formal training? meaning, what gets your application accepted?
[21:14] <ravn^Ron> raven: i know..and we're all headed
off topic too..sorry all
[21:14] <Soulhuntr> ::chuckles:: Not really. "formal"
training of course is a concept - The Estate simply represents one expression
of it or one style. However, by our thoughts currently we would expect
it to take about a year, with 2 long sessions a week for non residents
and a few weeks of 24/7 work.
[21:15] <Soulhuntr> qualifications? you must be, or
be owned by, a venture capitalist.
[21:15] <Soulhuntr> ::chuckles:: no... seriously :)
[21:16] <Soulhuntr> In the estate your qualifications
must match the skills needed by the type of tool you would be shaped
into. if youw ant to run your masters life... but have no head for details,
then you dont qualify. If you wish to be a pleasure slave but arent
capable of bisexual actiosn then you dont qualify.
[21:16] * Soulhuntr asks pardon for spelling .. he is
a slow enough typist to begin with
[21:16] * Soulhuntr "over"
[21:16] <ravn^Ron> that makes sense..so the training
takes into account the specific submissives talents/likes/dislikes and
such?
[21:17] <{sonja}JP> so anyone can just sign up.....?
[21:17] * _Flagg chuckles.
[21:17] <Roamer`> Soulhuntr: no problem ,wait til you
see some of my typos ......
[21:17] <ravn^Ron> no problem Soul :)
[21:17] <mizu> that would be the best way to start
[21:17] <Soulhuntr> yes, the trainign has to take that
into account. In our case, the estate is effectively "certifying" you
as being that type of tool... there is no way for us to do that unless
we can be sure of your skills.
[21:18] <Soulhuntr> yes sonja, anyoen can apply - though
owned slaves cannot apply themselves - their owner does it.
[21:18] <ravn^Ron> [21:14] <min`> what are the advantages
of "formal" training?
[21:19] <Lord_Vlad> what would be the advantage of
sending an owned slave to the estate?
[21:19] <{sonja}JP> so, can an unowned (wanting to
be slave) apply? and would there be a point to it?
[21:19] <Soulhuntr> the advantages depend soley on
the style of relationship yopu have. If your current or future owner
needs you to be a excellent hostess or what have you then formal trainign
may be the best way to get there. It also has status value, and fetish
value... it often happens to improve self discipline as well.
[21:20] <curiosity> do we just throw out questions
or is there some type of order here?
[21:20] * Soulhuntr is running a full ?? behind :)
[21:20] <ravn^Ron> yes Soul..don't worry..I'm catching
them..when it lulls will repaste missed questions..
[21:20] <Soulhuntr> LV - the advantages only manifest
under 2 circumstances - 1) you want the type of slave the estate can
produce and 2) you dont want to do it yourself
[21:21] <arella{C}> okay, why would having someone
else train your slave be a good idea, wouldn't some.. personal need
be missed in such at thing?
[21:21] <Soulhuntr> Those advantages are not hiddenr
or mystical in any way - they are primarily this - if you can survive
trying to please SirC, Flagg & I you will do really well pleasing
just your onw owner :)
[21:21] <min`> i'm assuming then the Owner would have
to be screened for what they exactly want then?
[21:22] <Soulhuntr> min - yes, we would try and help
the onwer decide what estate path is right for their property. but their
leeway is limited.
[21:22] <arella{C}> sorry, not at, A thing
[21:22] <Soulhuntr> arella - ....
[21:22] <bella{D}> Ken, could you liken Formal training
to military basic training?
[21:22] <Soulhuntr> personal? perhaps. Certainly we
do not fill the void of your owner - but then, that isnt what we are
for - "formal" implies slightly impersonal :)
[21:23] <Soulhuntr> bella - in its general advantages?
yes.
[21:23] <min`> if you limit the Owner's request then
howare you raining the property the the Owner's wants?
[21:23] <ravn^Ron> You kind of make that sound like
you three are very difficult to please...would you say that is so because
of the formality in the training of slaves/subs that are not specifically
"yours"?
[21:24] <min`> Correction: if you limit the Owner's
request then how are you training the property the way the Owner's wants?
[21:24] <Soulhuntr> min - we arent claiming to - we
are producing a product - if that product is what the owner would want
then we arew the right place, if they want something radically different
then they will find it someplace else. A BMW dealer simply cannot provide
you with a skateboard, for example :)
[21:25] <min`> okies gotcha :)
[21:25] <ravn^Ron> SO the owners would have to choose
among the areas of "expertise" that you train in?
[21:25] <Soulhuntr> no, I dont think the difficulty
comes from that, I simply mean that it is hard to please us because
we have rather specific things we enjoy - and they are somewhat different.
That shaped every aspect of the estate structure.
[21:25] <curiosity> what about long distance training?
how can persons living outside of your area recieve training?
[21:25] * ravn^Ron nods..makes sense..
[21:26] <Soulhuntr> yes, they and we work together
inside our "menu" so to speak - thought here is a lot fo flexability
there.
[21:26] <min`> correspondence courses? ;)
[21:26] <curiosity> what if there isn;t a bmw dealership
in my area <s>
[21:26] <ravn^Ron> <please hold questions for a
moment so Soul may catch up, if you wish, msg me with your question
and I will paste them into channel when lull/catch up has occured>
[21:26] <Soulhuntr> curiosity - generally - they can't.
We will be happy to work with them on a less formal basis - but unless
they can see us often it simplyw ont work.
[21:27] <Soulhuntr> Ok :) I think thats it - "over"
[21:27] <ravn^Ron> [21:21] <ravn^Ron> [21:19] <{sonja}JP>
so, can an unowned (wanting to be slave) apply? and would there be a
point to it?
[21:27] * ravn^Ron pastes the question she thinks wasmissed..if
I'm wrong..let me know please
[21:28] <Soulhuntr> Yes, they certainly could, in our
view they are acting as their own owner. And yes, it would have a point
- they know how they want to be used when they do find an owner... so
self trainign is a good thing.
[21:28] <Soulhuntr> "over"
[21:29] <Tatsumi> is the estate a matchmatching service
for unowned subs?
[21:29] <Tatsumi> :)
[21:29] <Soulhuntr> Nope :)
[21:29] <Soulhuntr> But we generally keep the really
pretty ones ;)
[21:29] <ravn^Ron> Ron: LOL
[21:29] <fairys_ki> lol
[21:29] * Roamer` chuckles
[21:29] <{sonja}JP> LOL
[21:30] <curiosity> what did you mean by "less formal"
training
[21:30] <arella{C}> How do you decide what to teach
unowned subs, in a sexual area, and do these things change in the case
of an owned submissive?
[21:30] <Soulhuntr> No, it doesnt change. The desired
skillset/skill-level and use determines what woudl have to be taught
- not the situation.
[21:30] <_Cryo_> add in "bisexual training" to that
one
[21:31] <Soulhuntr> In both cases they 'owner' may
define limitatiosn to be sure - but that may limit what they can become.
[21:31] * Soulhuntr over
[21:32] <ravn^Ron> so basically when deciding what
to train a sub/slave in, you work with both the sub (their abilities
etc) and their owner (his/her likes/dislikes and what they want) to
decide what area of training that you offer would be best for that particular
sub..and/or to possibly say that estate training would not be a good
thing for that particular sub?
[21:32] <bella{D}> Ken, how might those limitations
limit what they may become?
[21:32] <Soulhuntr> yes to rav/Ron...
[21:33] <min`> what areas do your training cover? just
service slaves?
[21:34] <Soulhuntr> bella - well, our version of the
classic idea of a 'pleasure' slave for examples is rather - broad :)
Limitations simplyw oudln't allow them to 'qualify' in any high level
for that with us. Ont he other hand, if your trainign a chauffeur/bodyguard
then it doesn't matter till you get to a certain point. Then it woudl
be difficult to overcome a complete limitations et.
[21:34] <ravn^Ron> If you teach someone not to do something
or to behave in a certain way..what's to say that this is going to be
what is needed/wanted/desired when the sub leaves the estate?
[21:34] <Lord_Vlad> Soul, can you present a sample
curriculum for us?
[21:34] <Soulhuntr> min - I would say 'yes', allowing
that "service slaves" is a vague term :) Remember that we see 'service'
as an extremely flexible category :)
[21:35] * ravn^Ron is doing her best to keep it general
but expected alotof estate specific questions because for many the estate
is the only formal training facility they have heard of..
[21:35] <Soulhuntr> LV - that woudl probably be too
much detail for this - and it is not that simple anyway :) if youw anna
discuss it in email thats cool :)
[21:36] <Soulhuntr> I'll try and be general where I
can :)
[21:36] <ravn^Ron> ok...min's question: [21:33] <min`>
what areas do your training cover? just service slaves?
[21:36] <Soulhuntr> min - I would say 'yes',
allowing that "service slaves" is a vague term :) Remember that we see
'service' as an extremely flexible category :)
[21:37] * Soulhuntr looks around innocently
[21:37] <ravn^Ron> service can be defined in many ways...from
ettiquette (a hostess type service) to a very personalized sexual service
submissive...so how does formal training assist in the training of a
sub?
[21:38] <ravn^Ron> of a service sub even..sorry..phrased
that wrong..
[21:38] <Soulhuntr> formal training can teach 1) specific
skills 2) specific attitudes 3) personality changes 4) descipline
[21:39] <{sonja}JP> Soulhuntr.....please dont try to
look innocent.....
[21:39] <Tatsumi> lol
[21:39] <Soulhuntr> those things help in almost every
case as far as I can tell :)
[21:39] * Soulhuntr >is< innocent
[21:39] <Tatsumi> LOL
[21:39] * arella{C} laughs..
[21:39] <arella{C}> uhmmm..
[21:39] * {sonja}JP hears thunder
[21:39] * arella{C} whispers.. liars go to hell
[21:39] <Lord_Vlad> i haVE a penthouse there (in hell)
LOL
[21:39] <_Cryo_> no, goats do
[21:39] <ravn^Ron> I know a few people here are wanting
some specific info..so lets go to specific skills..you describe 5 training
positions, with varying levels of skill under each one..can we take
these one at a time starting with pawn?
[21:40] <nessa{JW}> by formal training aaare
we speaking of sending the slave to an establishment, or formal training
from one's Dominant, or both ?
[21:40] <Tatsumi> both nessa
[21:40] <Soulhuntr> nessa - int he general sense, either
of those woudl apply
[21:40] <nessa{JW}> thank you Tatsumi Sir and Soulhuntr
Sir
[21:40] <Tatsumi> hehee, i'm a girl:P
[21:40] * _Cryo_ giggles
[21:40] <nessa{JW}> dang i was gonna ask
[21:40] <Soulhuntr> Dont buy it - shes butch :)
[21:40] <Tatsumi> and just Tats is fine:)
[21:40] <nessa{JW}> sorry, my bad
[21:40] <Tatsumi> LOL, am not Soul:P
[21:41] <Tatsumi> it's cool nessa:)
[21:41] <Soulhuntr> ok .. pawn....
[21:41] <Tatsumi> pawn? isn't that the hardest piece
Soul?
[21:41] <Soulhuntr> "the Pawn that most classically
matches the definition of a 'general use' submissive.The service of
the Pawn is the most obviously selfless, asking little in return for
the services rendered"
[21:42] <Soulhuntr> Generally speaking, "O" and most
of the marketplace submissives were pawns :)
[21:42] * Soulhuntr will not comment ont he phrase "hardest
peice" - but knows a limrick or two...
[21:42] <arella{C}> and he says he's innocent
[21:42] <ravn^Ron> I can see how that would be the
most difficult in that the areas of training would be quite far reaching...
[21:43] <Soulhuntr> "there once was a dom from natucket,
his ego was carried in buckets..."
[21:43] <Kimi> and learning selflessness is hard too
:)
[21:43] <Tatsumi> like in chess, doesn't the pawn turn
into other pieces when it gets to the other side of the board (meaning
high ranking) ?>
[21:43] <bella{D}> but, Ken, wouldn't that be good
basic training regardless of the chosen vocation?
[21:43] * arella{C} smiles to Roamer`
[21:43] <ravn^Ron> I would think it is very hard..so
how does one teach selflessness?
[21:43] <Soulhuntr> Yes Tatsumi :) The important thing
about pawn is general utility - it is your first response in many ways
- so the skilsl are rather broad :)
[21:44] <Soulhuntr> yes bella :) in fact, pawn trainign
IS the first thing someone gets - but it only needs to be mastered at
a basic level for specialty 'items'
[21:44] <nessa{JW}> you say "o" was
a pawn type, Sir, granted shes fixtional, but do you think she would
have been a service type if her needs were not being met? she
got used, and whipped often, never seemed to have to scrub the floors,
etc...
[21:45] <Soulhuntr> teaching selflessness is mostly
attempting to show someone the rewards :) selflessness is usually selfish
:)
[21:45] <bella{D}> can you clarify that Ken?
[21:45] <ravn^Ron> like what rewards Soul?
[21:45] <Soulhuntr> nessa - oh was not used to her
potential - but I believe the 'person' would have done well in service.
her desire was attention - the need to be needed - pawn would have done
her a lot of good.
[21:45] <nessa{JW}> *nod* thank you Sir
[21:46] <Soulhuntr> obviously someone who could become
a high level pawn already has the capacity to enjoy roundablout and
subtle rewards for her devotion - teachign her that is more a matter
of guided self realization. it cannot be created if the potential does
not exist.
[21:47] * {sonja}JP almost understood that
[21:47] <ravn^Ron> How would having one's sub trained
in general areas (such as the pawn level) differ in a formal setting
from a one on one dominant to their sub setting?
[21:47] <Soulhuntr> those rewards might include house
status, the affection of her owner, self satisfaction of being highly
skilled and so on.
[21:47] <curiosity> house status?
[21:48] <ravn^Ron> ok..that makes sense...I can see
how one can't create selflessness, or the ability to see reward in selflessness
if the basics are not already tehre..
[21:48] <Soulhuntr> Generally "informa" training deals
much less with low probablility issues or possable situations, it is
almost always geared only for the consumption of that one dominant.
[21:48] <_Cryo_> have all of your clientele fit neatly
into those categories? or have there been some.. vague ones?
[21:48] <Tatsumi> house status usually refers to one's
place in the heirarchy of a multi-household
[21:49] <curiosity> ty
[21:49] <Tatsumi> :)
[21:49] <ravn^Ron> so formal training would make the
submissive more adaptable to different situations instead of just having
a sub prepared for aspecific situation?
[21:50] <Tatsumi> yes ravn
[21:50] <ravn^Ron> [21:40] <curiosity> what
is the minimum stay/time that they will consider for training?
[21:50] <Soulhuntr> Cry - yes, everyone we worked with
could generally find some vocationt hat appealed to them .. though it
took time soemtimes :) Those that coudl not either stopped working with
us or didnt start. The vocations cover much more potential roles than
it seems ;)
[21:50] * Soulhuntr sheesh . I need to get faster :)
[21:51] <Soulhuntr> YEah, what Tatsumi said :)
[21:51] <Tatsumi> lol SOul
[21:51] <ravn^Ron> woops..sorry Soul..
[21:51] <Soulhuntr> minimum times .. I think Flaggs
guideline is about a year or so all told for basic skills, with two
visits a week or so.
[21:51] <arella{C}> be well..
[21:51] <ravn^Ron> so they don't have to live there
24/7?
[21:52] <arella{C}> would it be less time if they did
live there 24/7?
[21:52] <Tatsumi> most cant live on premises ravn.
it just isn't practical for people to take time from work & family
& such
[21:52] <Soulhuntr> certainly not at the beginning...
though I cannot imagine someone reeaching a very high level without
full time work.
[21:52] <ravn^Ron> this is true Tats..
[21:53] <ravn^Ron> Ron: Does this training include
sexual areas?
[21:53] <Soulhuntr> Living here woudl shorten it some
- but a lot of this is learning time that does not get shortened by
being with us. It might cut a month or two off.
[21:53] * arella{C} nods
[21:53] <Tatsumi> depends on what you're looking to
be trained in or have your sub be trained as Ron
[21:53] <Soulhuntr> Ron - it can, basic pawn does not
have to include it ... the rest woudl depend on speciality. A rook accountant
would not, a knight hostess might :)
[21:54] * Soulhuntr is getting faster :)
[21:54] <Tatsumi> :)Soul
[21:54] * Soulhuntr whee! look at my fingers go!
[21:54] <ravn^Ron> Ron: hmm..so it depends upon the
vocation or special area of training chosen?
[21:54] * bella{D} hands Ken more latte
[21:54] * ravn^Ron laughs..good going Ken!
[21:54] <ravn^Ron> [21:51] <{sonja}JP> how do they
sexually train a slave to a Master's desires/wants/specifications?
[21:55] * Soulhuntr is using both hands now
[21:55] <Tatsumi> lol
[21:55] * mizu giggles
[21:55] <Soulhuntr> that depends...
[21:55] <Soulhuntr> for example, we cannot guarentee
that she will fuck exactly the way you prefer....
[21:55] <{sonja}JP> may i clarify?
[21:55] <{sonja}JP> my question i mean?
[21:55] <Soulhuntr> but we could go a long way to teachign
her how to figure out what would please a guest of yours and be good
at that for him.
[21:55] <Soulhuntr> sure :) go for it :)
[21:56] <ravn^Ron> go ahead sonja..:)
[21:56] <arella{C}> then what would be the point of
you teaching her how to.. ughm.. fuck..
[21:56] <{sonja}JP> actually, i think that did it...........so
you would teach a slave to "learn" her Master's desires....kinda like
"look for this sign or that "
[21:56] <Soulhuntr> arella - well, lets take an example
:)
[21:56] <Soulhuntr> Dom A wants his sub to become a
much better sexual partner for him.....
[21:57] <Soulhuntr> we coudl not really help her become
a better oral lover if she was already fairly enthusiastic....
[21:57] <Soulhuntr> but we COULD help her become lots
better if she was ... resistant :)
[21:57] <Tatsumi> i would think formal training would
involve teaching someone how to enjoy all sexual activites and be proactive
or reactive when neccessary. also how to seduce someone and how to be
seduced... that kind of thing can be taught to anyone without having
to have a specific partner in mind
[21:57] <Tatsumi> :)
[21:58] <Soulhuntr> Dom B is happyw ith her performance....
[21:58] <Soulhuntr> but he wants her to be able to
be "passed around" at parties .. or to convince business associates
that she just couldnt resist them...
[21:58] <Soulhuntr> that, we can help with :)
[21:58] <{sonja}JP> o me o myo
[21:58] <Soulhuntr> In a way, there are sexual things
that a dom might want that can ONLY be learned at the hands of someone
other than him/her.
[21:59] * Soulhuntr thanks tats for the assist
[21:59] <{sonja}JP> for example?
[21:59] <Soulhuntr> oh... hwo to fuck like she loves
the guy when she doesnt care if he lives or dies :)
[21:59] <Tatsumi> np Soul:) hope it's helping, not
confusing:)
[21:59] <ravn^Ron> In other words, how to fake enjoyment?
[21:59] <Soulhuntr> that woudl be hard for her master
to teach her - she loves him. How could he test it?
[22:00] <ravn^Ron> I can see taht Ken..
[22:00] <ravn^Ron> raven has a few questions...
[22:00] <ravn^Ron> would formal training aide a dominantin
deciding whether or not a particular sub will meet his/her excpectations
without finding out the hard way (such as live together for a while,
then find that it jsut won'twork and people get hurt)?
[22:00] <ravn^Ron> dominant in deciding..even..
[22:01] <nessa{JW}> that i can see, Soulhuntr
Sir, what i cant understand and i understand thats a personal
thing for me, is why a dominant would want to give someone else the
pleasure of teaching their property how to be better in bed.
But i can see how having a third party would help if you wanted to have
tour slave passed around
[22:01] <Soulhuntr> rR - in one aspect, sure. but we
can also show them how to find the good int he situation... additionally,
we can teach them how to figure out what turns their guest on, and supply
it, in minimum time.
[22:01] <min`> formal training better for poly households
than a one on one D/s relationship, right?
[22:01] <Soulhuntr> ok... slow down a sec :)
[22:01] <Soulhuntr> nessa....
[22:03] <Soulhuntr> that is a personal thing indeed
- if they didnt want that skill taught by us, then they would have to
pick a vocationt hat didnt involve sexual use - or not have us work
with her.
[22:03] <Soulhuntr> rR....
[22:03] <Soulhuntr> yes, that could be one motivation.
[22:03] * Soulhuntr is caught up I think :)
[22:03] <ravn^Ron> not yet Soul...question that was
lost:
[22:03] <ravn^Ron> [22:01] <min`> formal training
better for poly households than a one on one D/s relationship, right?
[22:04] <Soulhuntr> ah :)
[22:04] <Soulhuntr> no. I dont think it matters :)
[22:04] <Soulhuntr> ok. .. now I'm done :)
[22:05] <ravn^Ron> Would formal training be helpful
in that some people do not know how to train a sub but do know what
they want the sub to be able to do?
[22:05] <ravn^Ron> Ron: or as a sub question: Do you
train dominants as well?
[22:06] <Soulhuntr> possibly - too much woudl depend
on the specific person.
[22:06] <{sonja}JP> good question....
[22:06] <Soulhuntr> No, we do not train dominants as
dominants, though it would be possible for a dom to train with us as
a sub.
[22:11] <ravn^Ron> [22:01] <min`> formal training
better for poly households than a one on one D/s relationship, right?
[22:12] <Tatsumi> ravn, SOul said it didn't matter
what kind of household. poly or mono.
[22:12] <Soulhuntr> ok :) No, I dont think it is more
or less useful for poly or single. Though generally households open
to the idea of formal trainign seem to be more open to poly.
[22:12] <_Cryo_> "What defines formal training?"
[22:12] * curiosity thinks bella is doing a great job
of typing with the pencil <g>
[22:12] <ravn^Ron> whoops..sorry I didn't see the response..thanks
Tatsumi :)
[22:13] <Soulhuntr> Cryo -
[22:13] <ravn^Ron> Ron: How would training a dom as
a sub, be helpful?
[22:13] <Soulhuntr> in my mind, formal training is
meant to be seen/used/useful/applied outside the casual on-on-one realtionship.
[22:14] <Tig-Grrr> hopefully formal training does not
mean to get dressed up in a tuxedo...hehehe
[22:14] <fadey> casual?
[22:14] <Soulhuntr> think of the differences between
a formal dinner or a casual one - its tone and atmosphere and intent
as much as specific actions.
[22:15] <ravn^Ron> Soul, my buffer is not big enough..so
I can't paste your definition of formal training from earlier to answer
Tig-Grrr's question...
[22:15] <Soulhuntr> no problem :)
[22:15] <Soulhuntr> that cover it for ya ?
[22:15] <arella{C}> [21:12] <Soulhuntr> For our
purposes, formal training means that there is a fairly clear set of
expectations and rules that everyone involved understands - also, that
that trainign is made with an eye for its usefulness and appreciation
by those who might not know the rules.
[22:15] <arella{C}> [21:12] <Soulhuntr> So...
[22:15] <ravn^Ron> thanks gf :()
[22:15] <arella{C}> [21:12] <Soulhuntr> while someone
may have lots of rule sint heir relationship...
[22:15] <arella{C}> [21:12] <Soulhuntr> it woudl
not really be "formal" if it didn't have that element of display about
it. Like "formal" dress as opposed to casual.
[22:15] <arella{C}> [21:13] * Soulhuntr "over"
[22:15] <ravn^Ron> :)) even
[22:15] * _Flagg considers alternate definitions....
[22:16] <Soulhuntr> shoot flagg :)
[22:16] <arella{C}> yw gf :)
[22:16] * Soulhuntr would welcome the input
[22:16] <ravn^Ron> I defined it as training of the
sub by someone other than his/her particular owner..usually an outside
source..
[22:16] <bella{D}> wouldn't formal training also indicate
a lack of 'personal' involvement/emotional overtones
[22:16] <ravn^Ron> go ahead Flagg..what's your definition?
[22:16] <bella{D}> So, a sub is trained for service
rather than love?
[22:17] <Soulhuntr> bella - yes :)
[22:17] * bella{D} gives herself a cookie
[22:17] * bella{D} shares with Ken and Tats...*smiles*
[22:18] <ravn^Ron> Could formal training negatively
impact training in general in that it be taken as the "only" way to
train a sub?
[22:18] <Soulhuntr> hmmm.....
[22:18] <Soulhuntr> no. I dont think so. I can't see
the problem. ...
[22:19] <fadey> do love and other such romantic entaglements
make personal training harder? if so, that would seem to be one
of the main benefits of formal training
[22:19] <_Flagg> Training revolving around an internally
consistent and ordered structure, based more cocretelt in protocol than
emotional motivation.
[22:19] <Soulhuntr> I also woudl nto be honest if I
didnt say I rarelyc onsider what most folks call trainign as training
in any sense. So the "formal" is meant to almost differentiate it from
a misused term.
[22:19] <fadey> also it would seem to make your motivations
clearer.. if you are serving someone aside from your lover, you are
serving for the sake of service
[22:19] <ravn^Ron> I would think that when it comes
to training one's own sub, the romantic entanglements could make it
more difficult for the dom to be as strict as he/she mgiht normally
be with someone he/she did not love..
[22:20] <Tatsumi> i agree fadey
[22:20] <Tatsumi> yes ravn, i agree
[22:20] <Soulhuntr> fadey - yes, it is more difficult
- but that isnt the only reason to bring in outsiders. There is an issue
of variety and perspective. if one person trains a sub she is good for
serving that one person, if 4 (us threew and her onwer) do it she can
serve anyone.
[22:20] <{sonja}JP> i think it might make it more difficult,
but it shouldnt stop it....
[22:20] <bella{D}> Also raven, it is more difficult
on the sub when the love is there.
[22:21] <ravn^Ron> how so bella?
[22:21] <ravn^Ron> makes sense to me Soul that outsider
training could make the sub better able to serve in a wider range of
situations, dealing with more than one dominant...
[22:21] <{sonja}JP> when you love someone, you should
have an even more vested interest in their well-being.....often times
a subs wellbeing depends on her being able to service/serve/please/etc,
her Master/Dom
[22:21] <bella{D}> it is easier to take correction
personally...to develop 'issues'...*smiles*
[22:21] <ravn^Ron> yes bella..that makes sense to me..
[22:21] <Kimi> <-agrees with bella
[22:22] <ravn^Ron> true sonja..but sometimes the love
gets in the way ..for example,punishment..sometimes people can say to
themselves.."I can't really hurt her, I love her" ..simply because corporal
punishment is entirely different from pain play for pleasure..
[22:22] <ravn^Ron> the love can also cause a dominant
to allow more leeway than they would otherwise...more room for "moods"
and such..
[22:23] <{sonja}JP> but one shouldnt let it get in
the way toooo much..........much in the same way a parent should discipline
their child
[22:23] <{sonja}JP> just because you love them, doesnt
mean you shouldnt teach them what is right or wrong
[22:23] <bella{D}> i would also think the desire to
HATE the person training you would be easier to deal with in a formal
setting, you are not supposed to love them.
[22:23] <ravn^Ron> exactly sonja! and finding that
middle ground is not always easy...so for some, haivng an outsider provide
training might be easier...
[22:23] <Soulhuntr> desire to hate?
[22:23] <{sonja}JP> but then, it only stays that way
if the sub stays "perfectly trained"
[22:24] <Tatsumi> SOul, like a drill sarge
[22:24] <ravn^Ron> Could an emotional tie develop during
formal training that could inhibit the training or cause problems with
the particular sub's owner?
[22:24] <Tatsumi> you hate him but you follow his direction
anyway for a greater purpose
[22:24] <Lord_Vlad> I hurt her *because* I love her.
If she doesn't experience punishment when needed, she doesn't grow.
[22:24] <{sonja}JP> if the Dom didnt have to go thru
the struggle of training......how does he continue disciplining
[22:24] <bella{D}> when pushed...that negative feeling
can confuse one in a romantic involvement
[22:24] <ravn^Ron> I agree Lord_Vlad
[22:25] * Lord_Vlad agrees with Tatsumi
[22:25] <Tatsumi> ravn, it is possible if the trainee
spends too much time with 1 trainer
[22:25] <Soulhuntr> sonja - it's easy. he knows our
standards - if she doesnt meet it he punishes her - it is easier for
him often because she now knows that bitching and complaining wont help
avoid it.
[22:25] <Tatsumi> that is one of the reasons for the
3 in the estate ( i think )
[22:25] <ravn^Ron> I think that might heavily rely
upon how the sub views themselves and punishment's role in the relationship...a
sub who knows they are pretty good at what they do most of the time,
would be less apt to take a punishment so personally that it totally
overshadows their future actions...
[22:25] <ravn^Ron> that would make sense to me Tatsumi
[22:26] * ravn^Ron tries to keep up as discussion splits
into two threads..
[22:26] * Soulhuntr 's head explodes :)
[22:26] <ravn^Ron> need a break Soul?
[22:26] <Tatsumi> lol
[22:26] * {sonja}JP ducks
[22:26] <{sonja}JP> icky
[22:26] * bella{D} casts a clean cantrip
[22:26] * ravn^Ron giggles and gets the duct tape beacuse
it works on everything and quickly tapes Soul's head before it can explode
too much..
[22:26] * MrAmax has trouble keeping up with single threads..
[22:26] <Soulhuntr> ok... yes, the fact that we are
three helps a lot with familiarity issues of all types :)
[22:26] <Tatsumi> brb
[22:27] * Lord_Vlad agrees with Ron
[22:27] * arella{C} sends blackrose after the mop..
[22:27] <Lord_Vlad> rofl
[22:27] <Lord_Vlad> someone get a mop...clean up that
mess! lol
[22:28] <ravn^Ron> LOL
[22:28] * Soulhuntr thinsk he is all caught up
[22:28] <ravn^Ron> you are..I'm trying to think of
a general question to ask next...anyone have one?
[22:28] * ravn^Ron is trying to keep to general training
questions first..estate specific second..
[22:29] <Tatsumi> ok
[22:29] <ravn^Ron> Ron: Have you ever had a submissive
fall in "love" with one of the trainers at the estate and did that make
the formal training more difficult or easier?
[22:29] <sierra_> love is a nasty, messy, disorderly
thing.
[22:29] <bella{D}> sierra of the logical mind...*smiles*
[22:30] <Soulhuntr> hmmm...
[22:30] <Tatsumi> how can you tell when someone is
done with their training and "ready to go back into the world"?
[22:30] <Tatsumi> lol sierra
[22:30] <Soulhuntr> I dont know of "rogue" love being
a real problem for us so far.
[22:30] <{sonja}JP> messy.......sometimes.........disorderly.....occasionally......nasty......well
only in mindset :)
[22:30] <Soulhuntr> when they can carry the bucket
of coals without crying :)
[22:30] <bella{D}> nasty when misplaced.
[22:30] <ravn^Ron> Ron:messy sometimes, disorderly
occasionally..nasty..only when done right <eg>
[22:31] <arella{C}> the bucket of coals?
[22:31] <Soulhuntr> Seriously....
[22:31] <ravn^Ron> raven shakes her head and giggles...
[22:31] <{sonja}JP> oh Ron......get outtta there :)
[22:31] <ravn^Ron> raven: i think he likes the gutter
sonja..:)
[22:31] <Tatsumi> lol
[22:31] <{sonja}JP> only M and girlies are allowed
in my head :)
[22:31] <Soulhuntr> someone's being "done" has a lot
to do with what level of skill thyey wanted to attain. It's a judgment
call. Technically ti si voted on by all threee trainers/
[22:31] <ravn^Ron> LOLOL sonja
[22:31] <ravn^Ron> Ron: LOLOL Sonja
[22:31] <ravn^Ron> Ron: just getting carry over from
raven and arella sonja.. :)
[22:32] <ravn^Ron> do journals have any use in formal
training? if so, what? if not, why not?
[22:32] <ravn^Ron> (anyone can answer, or add their
opinions folks)
[22:32] <bella{D}> Ken, Curiosity had asked earlier
about LD training...you had mentioned something about it being less
formal. Does that mean that LD training IS a possibility?
[22:32] <Soulhuntr> ok.....
[22:33] <Soulhuntr> >i< dont use journals much -
Flagg is rather fond of them. As for why not, I am much more of a verbal
guy.
[22:33] <bella{D}> I think unedited journals help a
lot.
[22:33] <{sonja}JP> no puter for training journal....
[22:33] <Soulhuntr> 2) LD woudl only work as something
from in between visits. but we will often talk to someone "unofficially"
if they have specific questions.
[22:33] <ravn^Ron> Soul, what if the sub is just learning
to be confident/proficient in speaking her thoughts/feelings verbally?
[22:34] <ravn^Ron> do you then seek another way of
finding out what she thinks/feels while working on making her more proficient
inspeaking them?
[22:34] <ravn^Ron> how so bella?
[22:35] <Soulhuntr> personally, No. I generally jsut
yell till they cry and spill their guts :)
[22:35] * {sonja}JP thinks that with only verbalization.......there
is no way to "look back" on progress
[22:35] <ravn^Ron> reminiscing could accomplish that
sonja :)
[22:35] <{sonja}JP> NO one ever "remembers" anything
precisely
[22:36] <Tatsumi> you think Soul is kidding... he's
not
[22:36] <fadey> i find that the only real measure of
progress for me is what i see inside myself..not so much what i have
on paper
[22:36] <ravn^Ron> doesn't yelling just not work in
some cases?
[22:36] <_Cryo_> I use the journal to watch the behavior
development and thought processes.
[22:36] <bella{D}> it is a place for the sub to write
down everything - thoughts feelings etc, without fear of repercussion.
That makes it more honest, and thusly of use in further training
[22:36] <ravn^Ron> I didn't think he was kidding Tatsumi..
[22:36] <arella{C}> what if the yelling just caused
the person to become More closed?
[22:36] <Soulhuntr> I dont mind if someone keeps a
journal for themselves, but I wouldnt read it often. If I did then they
would be talking "to" me, not themselves. There is no such thing as
"unedited" expression when you knwo someone else will read it.
[22:36] <Tatsumi> they need to get over it in a formal
environment arella
[22:36] <{sonja}JP> true
[22:36] <ravn^Ron> yelling would just make me angry...and
I'd start yelling back..not good..no constructive thoughts would come
out..
[22:36] <fadey> i agree wholeheartedly with the last
thing you said Soul about no such thing as unedited
[22:37] <_Cryo_> it makes it easier to say "go look
back in November and see how you were, versus what you are now"
[22:37] <arella{C}> yelling makes me close down, compleatly,
I wouldn't cry, I'd just tell myself I didn't give a shit and nothing
anyoen could say would matter anymore
[22:37] <{sonja}JP> M just keeps saying "what" pretty
quietly, till i spill my guts........not loud.......just persistent
[22:37] <Tatsumi> ravn, ever have a boss who yelled?
i have and it was hard not to yell back but i got used to it eventually.
most service subs are able to deal with it.
[22:37] <Soulhuntr> True enough... reprimands are not
always gentle, nor does an owner always hav the luxury of a heart to
heart, I have a lot of times simply demanded to be told the problem...
given my view on it and moved on in a minute or two. There simply is
not always the luxury or desire to be a therapist.
[22:38] <ravn^Ron> It depends on whether or not a person
was taught how to write unedited in a journal..but I have to agree that
there are indeed times when writing in a journal, that you know someone
else is going to read, you want to edit your thoughts...it's a matter
of training onself not to do that..
[22:38] <Soulhuntr> arella - the purpose is NOT to
make you feel better , the purpose is to get you back on track .. if
you close down but correct the error or atttude that is fine by me.
[22:38] <bella{D}> exactly raven...
[22:38] <ravn^Ron> true Tatsumi..(on the yelling)
[22:39] * _Flagg would like to contribute a comment...
[22:39] <Soulhuntr> My DI yelled at me all the time,
my Sensei does it now... my 'feelings' are not the issue, the issue
is getting a point accross.
[22:39] <ravn^Ron> so formal training's purpose is
behavior modification only?
[22:39] <Soulhuntr> Shoot big guy!
[22:39] <ravn^Ron> go ahead Flagg :))
[22:39] * {sonja}JP trained herself not to yell back to
a screaming ex husband
[22:39] <Soulhuntr> ravn - no, but sometimes a reprimands
purpose is that only.
[22:39] <Lord_Vlad> moonchild: that sounds like my
*M* sonja
[22:39] <ravn^Ron> I'm not sure that I can agree that
a sub's feelings are not an issue with BDSM...
[22:39] * Lord_Vlad says: It takes what it takes...
[22:40] <ravn^Ron> AHhhhhhh.,.ok Soul..thanks for the
clarification that makes sense :)
[22:40] <ravn^Ron> however, I can see where the feelings
are not a major issue in a formal training arrangement..
[22:40] <Tatsumi> i dont know that they are an issue
with formal training ravn
[22:40] <ravn^Ron> sorry all..my mind is working in
fragments..
[22:40] <Soulhuntr> Example: if a submissive has some
issue that is eating her up in side 5 minutes before guest arrive -
if she cannot control it then possible "instant catharsis" will help
:)
[22:40] <mizu> most of the time raven, than and condiotioning
[22:40] <Tatsumi> you're feelings should be betweeen
you and your owner
[22:41] <_Flagg> arella, closing down is a choice.
one can learn to rise above it, or succumb to it. It is not inevitable.
[22:41] * Soulhuntr looks for Flaggs comment - I am sure
he is gonna punish me :(
[22:41] * ravn^Ron thinks of Flagg punishing Soulhuntr
and rolls around laughing hysterically..ohmy!!!!!!!!!!
[22:41] <Tatsumi> lol Soul
[22:41] * arella{C} giggles
[22:41] <_Flagg> sometimes feelings have to take a
back seat.
[22:41] <bella{D}> feelings, even in an informal relationship,
are not always the issue.
[22:41] <ravn^Ron> I understand and agree with that...
[22:42] * ravn^Ron rephrases...I was just wanting to know
whether or not the sub's feelings matter at all in a formal training
situation..and got an answer.. :)
[22:43] <ravn^Ron> OK..I'm sure people have estate
specific questions they want to ask...shall we open to them now?
[22:43] <Soulhuntr> 'k
[22:43] <ravn^Ron> Ron: Is there a cost involved in
training at the estate?
[22:44] <Soulhuntr> There is expense, but no fee.
[22:44] <Soulhuntr> We have standardised leather (collars,
cuffs and so on) - the trainee purchases her own set directly fromt
he store.
[22:44] <ravn^Ron> Ron: So it would cost for the sub's
expenses, but there is no fee for services rendered (the actual training)...
[22:44] <ravn^Ron> raven: makes sense..
[22:44] <Tatsumi> trainees must find lodging, and pay
for thier own leathers/toys
[22:44] <Soulhuntr> Aside from 2000$ a day room and
board its free :)
[22:45] <ravn^Ron> ROFL
[22:45] <Tatsumi> lol
[22:45] <Tatsumi> he's kidding:P
[22:45] <ravn^Ron> I thought so..:)
[22:45] <ravn^Ron> Ron: laughing...that's what it's
costing me to keep her here!
[22:45] <ravn^Ron> raven: Ahh..so you really want to
get rid of me?? I see..I knew it..<joke>
[22:45] <Tatsumi> hehehe
[22:45] <ravn^Ron> raven gets the *glare* ...mmmmmmm..shutting
up now..
[22:46] * {sonja}JP ponders how smart raven is...
[22:46] <ravn^Ron> not very sonja...:)
[22:46] * ravn^Ron keeps letting her mouth run further
than it should...
[22:46] <bella{D}> Ken, do you only accept those that
can be there for the regular sessions?
[22:46] <_Cryo_> hmm
[22:47] <Soulhuntr> Yes, generally speaking (Flagg?)
[22:48] <ravn^Ron> What do you mean by "vocation" Ken?
[22:48] <Tatsumi> can i steal Soul for a minute?
[22:48] <ravn^Ron> sure :)
[22:48] <_Flagg> did not suggest it was easy.But this
is about overcoming one's own shortcomings. It's about effort.
[22:48] <ravn^Ron> Ron: Be sure to send him back in
one peice..
[22:48] * {sonja}JP thinks she knows the answer but wants
to ask anyways........if you dont charge for your training, why do you
do it?
[22:48] <Soulhuntr> brb 1 minute, I am sure Flagg can
cover :)
[22:48] <_Cryo_> how successful has formal training
been?
[22:49] <_Cryo_> percentage wise
[22:49] <_Cryo_> like, out of how many come in for
a session, how many are walking out?
[22:49] <Tatsumi> good night !
[22:49] <_Cryo_> and how many crawl out :)
[22:50] <ravn^Ron> Flagg is lagged and I believe Soul
is AFK...want to take a stab at answering Kimiko?
[22:50] <Kimi> sure I can try :)
[22:50] <Kimi> which one first?
[22:50] <ravn^Ron> cool :)
[22:50] <ravn^Ron> lets start with sonja's since she
typed in first...then Cryo's..
[22:50] <Kimi> I asked
[22:51] <ravn^Ron> cheaper than what mizu?
[22:51] <{sonja}JP> mine last, it is almost 11, it
would be a good ender - doncha think?
[22:51] <Kimi> They train because they had a standard
in which they wanted to see in their own submissives and since no one
else was doing it decided to offer it. They also enjoy training.
[22:52] <ravn^Ron> makes sense Kimi :)
[22:52] <Kimi> Cryo...to my knowledge there hasn't
been a "completed" trainee...but I do know that of the Trainee's I know
personally, we have all grown
[22:53] <ravn^Ron> since training is ongoing, in that
desires likes/dislikes tend to change over time, could there essentially
be a "completed" trainee?
[22:54] <Lord_Vlad> Yikes! ;-)
[22:54] <Kimi> I would think that if a Trainee came
to the estate instated by an owner or themselves and only did basic..there
could be a completed trainee
[22:54] <ravn^Ron> ok..I can see that...
[22:54] <Kimi> if likes/dislikes changed and they wanted
to come back ...that would be possible
[22:55] <ravn^Ron> that makes sense as well Kimiko...
[22:55] <Kimi> :) i'm glad i can help answer
[22:55] <ravn^Ron> Kimiko, can you overview the 5 training
vocations and how they differ?
[22:55] <Kimi> Sure.
[22:57] <Kimi> Pawn...general use...hardest to achieve
because of the range of skill that need to be learned successfully
[22:57] <Kimi> Bishop...confidant, companion. hard
because a closeness to the owner is needed...requires self dedication
and motivation not to let service slip
[22:57] <Kimi> or respect slip
[22:58] <Kimi> do you need me to wait?
[22:58] <ravn^Ron> nope Kimi..go for it :)
[22:58] <ravn^Ron> they were all 5minutes behind anyway..
:)
[22:58] <ravn^Ron> and the log will be going on web
site..so they can see/read the parts they missed if they want to :)
[22:59] <Kimi> Knight..a specific skill that they are
good at requiring subtlety. for example a diplomat, the girl you'd send
to the party to gather info for you
[22:59] <Soulhuntr> is bak
[22:59] <Kimi> Rook...specific skill though less subtle...cook,
chaufeer...
[22:59] * Soulhuntr watches Kimi type :)
[23:00] <Kimi> Queen...a manager. someone you could
entrust the running of your house or buisness to. would have authority
over others in the absence of the owner (not necessarily the most important
or highest status position)
[23:00] <Kimi> there ya go
[23:01] <{sonja}JP> ty Kimi
[23:01] <Kimi> welcome :)
[23:01] <ravn^Ron> Can one train in more than
one vocation?
[23:01] <fadey> i was wonder, when you guys get a minute,
if there were specific personality attributes that are more important
when doing formal training, as opposed to a casual one on one training
situation..?
[23:01] <Soulhuntr> yes, in theory. in practice the
time demands would be extreme
[23:01] <bella{D}> so, would a Queen be similar to
a major domo?
[23:01] * {sonja}JP agrees with the second part of Lord_Vlad's
statement
[23:02] <Soulhuntr> bella - it could e... Queen is
more often likened to the old royal concept of consort.
[23:03] <Soulhuntr> A majordomo could be a queen, a
rook or a night.
[23:03] <Soulhuntr> a majordomo typically runs a house
- a queen could also represent one in outside affairs.
[23:03] <bella{D}> ack..okay..*smiles*...
[23:03] <ravn^Ron> How do you teach the things needed
for say a queen to manage/run a household? Wouldn't there have to be
a rather general curriculum in that vocation? such as learning budgets
and things..
[23:04] <bella{D}> so, the vocation of a major domo
would depend on their other uses?
[23:04] <Soulhuntr> rR - yes, it would be , and often
part of out job IS to set up a schedule of external schooling and training.
[23:04] <Soulhuntr> bella - yes.
[23:05] <ravn^Ron> raven: that makes sense Soul..
[23:05] <ravn^Ron> anyone else have estate specific
questions?
[23:08] <ravn^Ron> Soulhuntr, Kimiko, Flagg and Tatsumi
(yes I know they aren't still here)..Thank you all for being here, I
appreciate it. :)
[23:08] <ravn^Ron> thanks all...it went extremely well..
:)